Röstkort

Having resigned myself to cajoling from the sidelines in the upcoming referendum on whether Sweden should join the EMU, I was surprised and, to be honest, gleeful to find an actual röstkort, or voting card, in my mail when I dropped into Stockholm for a job interview this past weekend. It appears that, as a resident, I am eligible to vote in this referendum. And vote no I will. My reasons are here, here and here.

I’m really quite flattered by this. This is making me very grateful to Sweden. It will in fact be the first time in my life that I get to vote. Admittedly, it is unusual to find a Belgian who has never voted — you are obligated by law to vote if you are in the motherland on election day. But I’ve hardly ever lived in Belgium, and certainly not on an election day. Meanwhile, Belgians living “abroad” were not eligible to vote until this year. So don’t blame me for my dismal voting record, blame the size of my country — I never manage to stay in itThis weblog was all set to ease slowly back into substantive issues after a summer’s worth of somewhat superficial travelogging (one of the downsides of reading this blog is that when I’m shallow, you’ll know about it), when in popped this gloriously bloggable röstkort..

Everywhere else I’ve lived, I’ve been subject to the usual regime of taxation without representation. The US was especially happy to take my tax dollars without asking me how to spend them. Voting opportunities, then, have not exactly been falling in my lap.

Until now, apparently. I had been under the impression that even progressive Sweden would leave weighty decisions — such as whether to switch currencies — to Swedish citizens only. Every Swede I’ve talked to had assumed so too; Anna and Magnus were in despair at my newly acquired electoral clout, though perhaps their reaction had more to do with how I plan to use my vote. I can see their point, however. How dare I have a say in the future of Sweden so rapidly after my arrival here; I’ve been a resident in Sweden for less than a year. All I had to do was turn up and register for an ID card.

I went to a party for foreign ministry types Friday night, where EMU discussions were rampant. I posited a few theories. Perhaps my röstkort was a mistake? “The state never makes mistakes,” one Swede replied, with a wry smile.

“It shows they’re desperate,” said another. If they’re letting foreigners vote, it’s because they need all the yes votes they can get, and foreigners, presumably, are already sold on the euro. Would this be legal? Quite possibly, because these folkomröstningar, or referendums, are not actually legally binding, though they have a moral authority that a Swedish government would find impossible to ignore.

Nobody was in any doubt that the result of the referendum will be a no. Polls have shown a consistent majority for the no-camp, though I wouldn’t write off the yes camp just yet: In particular, many Swedes have been on vacation in euroland, where they used and possibly liked the euro. The mood of these returning holidaymakers has not yet been captured by polls.

Almost everyone at this Stockholm party intended to vote yes. In the spirit of debate, I told several people that their voting intentions stem from nothing more than desire to vote in favor of whatever rural Sweden is against. If the farmers are against it, then it has to be a good thing, goes the rationale. This mental shortcut is lazy, for it leaves out the possibility that most no-voters have reached the correct conclusion for the wrong reason. I believe this is the case. Most reasons for voting no are bunk, but this does not invalidate the no case — most reasons for voting yes are bunk too.

Also, the euro vote is not necessarily a choice between what is good for Sweden and what is good for Europe. I am convinced that a no vote is the best thing both for Sweden and the EU. Expanding EMU beyond its optimal area is going to lead to political frictions as soon as member countries’ immediate economic goals diverge, as they are already beginning to do. I am a strong believer in keeping the monetary and political spheres separate, because I hope that the EU keeps on growing. The EU should be a club for countries that observe best practices in democracy, free trade, and human rights, not an exclusionary Christian country club, not an economic fortress, and certainly not, as one person was hoping, a “counterbalance” to US power (oh the folly of that idea).

But I am repeating myself; more interesting was the positive reception these ideas got from many of the people I talked to. The economic risks were readily acknowledged; instead, the maintenance of political clout within the EU was touted as the ultimate reason for their yes vote. “Sweden should be a joiner,” was the refrain. “Sweden should be in the lead.” Sure, unless the planned activity is jumping off a cliff.

I could of course be wrong. The euro might just work fabulously, despite the risks. I promise to vote yes in 5-10 years if this is the case, so that Sweden can join at the same time as Poland and the Baltics. In the meantime, Sweden’s GDP growth looks set to handily outpace that of euroland. Adopting the euro is a decision that is practically impossible to undo; there really is no need to rush into itImages courtesy of my röstkort. This last image instructs me to eat a hot dog after voting..

I will vote conscientiously on September 14, but there is one thing that receiving my röstkort has allowed me to do right away. I now have a much more satisfying way to end EMU arguments. I tried it on Anna, and boy does it work: “In any case,” I told her, “my vote will cancel out yours.”

Accidental tourist

I take it all back, everything that I said about Ryanair. Two months and 6 flights later, it’s clear that deregulation is drastically changing the way Europeans will fly — much in the same way it did in the US. The era of the accidental tourist is truly upon us: Cheap last minute flights now make it possible to fly from London to Italy on a whim.

And that is what I did last week. Matthew and Kim had already hired a villa outside Siena, Michael B. had already rented the car from Rome’s airport; I just needed to show up at the appointed hour. In the event, I managed to talk Eurof into abandoning his wife and child, and off we went, like Navy Seals of tourism, ready to be dropped into the world’s cultural hot spots on 48 hours notice.

Random acts of tourism have their payoffs. In our case, it was stumbling onto the Palio horse race, which began on the day we went into town. While others had waited for hours in 40-degree heat to witness the race, we rounded the corner to the Piazza del Campo just as the canon went off and the race started. It wasn’t fair — we should suffer more for our arte.

New trend alert: In crowds, digital cameras are now held aloft as periscopes for the shorter members of the entourage.

Skellig Michael and Great Blasket

Skellig Michael is a rock jutting 217 meters straight out of the Atlantic swell some 14 km off Ireland’s westernmost coast. It bears the brunt of what the Gulf Stream throws at the mainland, so it is fiendishly hard to land on. Nevertheless, it’s been visited since Celtic times by the odd persevering pilgrim — druids were drawn to the impossible fresh-water spring on its cliffs, and in the 6th century, a hermit went to live on its grassy summit, closer to God. A few more pilgrims stayed, and thus Ireland’s most fabled hermitage came to be. There were never more than a handful of monks present, but over the centuries they built a warren of beehive huts at the summit, and carved steps into the cliffsThey held out until the 13th century, when climate change forced them to abandon the monastery. Detailed histories of the island can be found here and here..


Skellig Michael is on the left, further away. Little Skellig, a bird sanctuary, looms on the right.

Until Irish monks discovered Iceland in the 9th century, Skellig lay at the edge of the world. Ships rounding Ireland had to pass by it or flounder founder on its cliffs. Vikings took an interest, and raided the monastery in 812, and again in 823. In 993, the viking Olav Trygvasson visited, was impressed, and came away baptised. He went back to Norway, became King Olav I, and forcibly converted his country to Christianity. Norwegians, then, have Skellig to thank for their religionScilly Islanders are under the impression Olav was baptised on their islands. Both Scilly and Skellig (Sceilig in Irish) are derived from the Gaelic word for rock. But it’s Skellig that had the hermits, and it’s Skellig that induces the fear of God in people. Vikings would have had coddled Scilly islanders for breakfast. The original account (including a mistranslation of Sceilig) is here (scroll down to para. 32). It’s gripping reading, what these vikings got up to..


This is Little Skellig, close up. The white specks are thousands of birds.

Almost a thousand years later, a Norwegian returned the favor. Thirty kilometers to the North of Skellig, some 5 km off the end of Dingle peninsula, lie the Blasket Islands, Skellig lookalikes save for the largest, Great Blasket, a long narrow ridge with grassy slopes. It too is often made unapproachable by the Atlantic swell, but for hundreds of years it supported a hamletful of fishermen farmers.

This community was perhaps Ireland’s remotest. By the turn of the 20th century, most of Ireland had switched to English, but Blasket Islanders still spoke Irish, though their numbers were thinning. In 1907, the Norwegian linguist Carl Marstrander visited Great Blasket and soon had the islanders convinced they were a living treasure of language and folklore. He proved to be the proverbial grain of sand in the oyster; the villagers began to write, and the result was a splendid and prolific literary harvest. Marstrander and his protégés got to the island just in time; the village was abandoned in 1953.


The northwest coastline of Great Blasket Island, looking southwest towards America.

I visited both Skellig and Great Blasket last week. I wasn’t able to set foot on Skellig — the swell was too great on the appointed day — but the island was certainly imposing. George Bernard Shaw’s own account of his visit finds him grasping for words, so I won’t even attempt my own rendition, at least not until I set foot on the island, next time. As our little boat bobbed in the wash of the waves crashing against the rocks, the three most annoying of the 12 passengers threw upNo, Felix, I wasn’t one of them., to my great satisfaction. One of them was an unpleasant German who had previously been snarky about my picture-taking, in German to his wife, but I had understood him perfectly. The captain merely smiled and looked away — at 35 euros a head, I wouldn’t mind rinsing landlubber vomit off my boat either. Perhaps Skellig is closer to God.


The Blasket Islands seen from Dunquin, the closest village on the mainland.

Great Blasket Island is on the verge of being discovered by mainstream tourism. There is a visitor center in place on the mainland, and a 3-room hostel and cafe are open for the duration of the summer, when the island is serviced by a small ferry. For now, many of the visitors are daytrippers of a literary bent; they’ll navigate the abandoned village, book in hand, retracing the steps of the characters they’ve read about. Some come for a few days, erecting tents in the husks of abandoned cottages, in search of shelter, and a little horizontal space on this diagonal island.


The northwest coastline of Great Blasket Island, looking northeast towards the Dingle peninsula.

My own appreciation of the islanders’ literary feats came after I visited. The day I was there, I merely clambered around the island, seeking more and more incredible views. Now that I’ve read Peig’s stories, and Eibhlis’s letters, and as I’m in the middle of The Islandman, their lives are being evoked with an immediacy that few books I’ve read can muster. The whole collection forms a web of narratives spanning generations, sharing characters, yet each with an honest, distinct perspective.

So there you have it: An island of Irish monks and an island of Irish writers, both intimately linked to Norway. It’s stranger than fiction.

Dublin survival notes

Dublin has the best bookstores I’ve ever seen. They’re like the London specialty ones, but cheaper. In this town, the section for books by local writers holds vast swathes of the English-language corpus. And these stores litter the city, interspersed by traditional cafés like Bewley’s where people really sit and read for hoursAnd I thought Ireland was all about the pubs..

All this literary splendor is lost on summer’s most ubiquitous Dubliners — schoolkids from Italy and Spain, sent by la mama to learn English in a Catholic country, lest they be corrupted by Protestantism and notions of divorce. From what I can tell, their exposure to English amounts to the daily ordering of a Big Mac Menu from the McDonalds on Grafton Street, where these hormonal hordes congregate for lunch.

But they cannot avoid exposure to some of the greatest Irish fiction, because it is found on Dublin bus timetables. These have no connection whatsoever to actual bus appearances. When buses do appear, they arrive in clots, and then they are frequently half full by New York standards, which means the driver decides no more passengers could fit, so he guns it past the busstop. Even if his bus is empty, he might still decide to drive by you if you fail to hail sufficiently eagerly. Should you be fortunate enough to actually catch a bus, don’t try to get off via the back door, they don’t actually work. If you do something New Yorkish like yelling “back door!” when they refuse to open, or perhaps try to follow the instructions (“Push to open,” no mention of emergencies), you will be reprimanded by the driver.

I also discovered today that Dublin barbers are very good. Here they actually seem to know what to do with a bald pate in need of mowing. In Stockholm, barbers study my head quizzically, then peck at it haltingly with miniature tools, as if short hair requires small measures. In Dublin, it is shorn with confidence.

Irish Broadband

Warning: The following is another of those horrid posts about the mechanics of the internet. Not interesting at all, but in the same way that breathing isn’t interesting…

If hell is an offline existence, then surely purgatory is dialup internet access. I was weaned on 1Mbps+ in New York, and in Sweden I was ogling the 26 Mbps (!) service being introduced by Bostream, so when I saw my parents’ paltry setup here in Dublin I decided to get them up to speed, so to speak.

Ireland, the European technology darling of the 90s, would surely be drenched in broadband. Not so. I was told there was no broadband internet access available to our (posh) area in Dublin. Incredulous, I set out to prove the naysayers wrong, and thought I had scored an early victory when I found that the local cable company, NTL, had started broadband services just last month. I called them, expectantly, but they informed me that they were only experimenting, really, and no, our area wasn’t going to be serviced for a long while yet.

They did, however, offer a special kind of internet access that they would gladly install anywhere in Dublin. The salesman quoted the price a little sheepishly: 9800 a year for a 512kbps leased line. I actually said “Oh, that’s not too bad” before I realized he was talking in euros, not kroner. For that price, I would expect my emails to be delivered personally. No wonder NTL is not rushing to roll out cheap cable internet services.

DSL, then. No luck here either. Although the phone lines clearly suffice for the ISDN setup they support, they apparently don’t qualify for ADSL, the operator told us; either our phone lines are too old or we are too far from a switching station (here in the center of Dublin), though which of these two possible reasons it might be the operator wouldn’t tell. Could we get a new phone line? We could, but she couldn’t tell us if that new line would qualify until we got it. Fat chance, then.

Is it really possible nobody laid any decent cable in Dublin, through which the internet might flow unfettered to the masses? Apparently so, and I am not the only one to notice. It’s actually cause for a political movement here. Might there then be a push for free and public wireless access, á la what’s being built in the East Village? Well, there is a nascent group doing noble work here, yet Dublin is too diffuse and the transmitters too weak to blanket the area. But their nodemap did put me in touch with people who knew of a local company offering residential wireless internet access.

Bingo. They have a transmitter some 800 meters from the house, and an (obligatory) line-of-sight survey confirmed we get a good strong signal from it. Today they came and installed the antenna, and I’ve been in broadband heaven for hours now. Most surprising is the strong upload capacity: Earlier, I was video iChatting with Felix in New York. Nice perk: a fixed IP address!

Watch this space. I have a huge backblog to inflict on you in the next few days.

Dublin: notes

The worst thing I could say about Dublin is that visually, it is probably the EU’s least impressive capitalProbably, because I have yet to visit Helsinki. And Luxemburg is certainly in the running.. But I really don’t mind the lack of eye candy; I suspect it is because Dubliners have never been materialists. In any case, the labors of its favorite sons are much more impressive than a monument or two. Anyone can build a monument.

This may explain the relative unease that has greeted the latest “modern” monument in Dublin — a 120-meter high metal spike, in a renovated part of town, that the locals have yet to fully adopt. It is a piece of public architecture tailor-made for deconstruction. It is tall, and strong, yet it seems the planners were unsure how much of a statement it should make. The spike has a brushed-metal sheen, and in the typical overcast skies it all but disappears. It projects ambivalence, above all else, but this may be apt: The go-go 90s and all this talk about the Celtic Tiger are a notable departure from the traditional image the Irish have of themselves. They are not yet comfortable in the role of EU wunderkind, because it is a success measured by criteria such as GDP growth and per capita income, not the traditional criteria Ireland excels at: per capita great writers; net cultural exports.

Dubliners autoanalyse themselves, of course, and rather articulately so:

“The Irish are the blacks of Europe, Dubliners are the blacks of Ireland, and the North Siders are the blacks of Dublin … so say it loud — I’m black and I’m proud!”

So says Jimmy in the 1991 film The Commitments. The prosperity of the intervening decade must have softened this self-image somewhat. I remembered Jimmy’s line while watching the East German nostalgia comedy Good Bye Lenin! at the excellent Irish Film Center,The center is in Dublin’s Temple Bar, as in the neighborhood, not the bar. I’m sure many more New Yorkers have been confused. and it struck me that recent Irish experience must have more in common with that of the Eastern Europeans. Newfound wealth, spread unevenly, is worn uneasily, with much fretting about maintaining an identity forged amid privationGood Bye Lenin!, while funny enough, could have benefited from a thicker slathering of British comic timing. The film is primarily a cathartic exercise for ex-East Germans, though, with us as incidental audience. My main peeve: Using the musical score from Amélie to heighten the emotional appeal is merely distracting. Get your own score, I say..

Dublin is now among the world’s most expensive cities. In the eurozone, it ranks second only to Milan; in the EU, it is fourth after London and Copenhagen. 21st in the world, it climbed from 73rd last year. Take a moment, then, to permanently sever the connection you have in your mind between the words “Ireland” and “cheap”.

Despite the material successes in Ireland’s recent history, the Irish above all remain geniuses at intangibles — dance, music, but especially the narrative form. Take a great English writer, and there’s a good chance he’s Irish. Shaw, Joyce, Wilde, Yeats, Swift, Beckett, Trollope, Heaney, and many others… For a nation of under 5 million, that amounts to punching way above its weight.

The following is perhaps a stretch, and I am too new to Ireland to back it up, so I would appreciate constructive criticism/flamings, butI’m off to Dingle peninsula tomorrow for 5 days of hiking, so it is entirely possible my first exposure the West coast demolishes the basic premise of this post.: my hunch is that the deft hand with which the Irish handle a yarn is a skill passed on from Celtic times, where culture’s core revolved around great mythic sagas. Christianity, when it reached Irish shores, also took on a reverence for ancient texts. My theory, then, is that in traditional Irish culture the narrative takes precedence over the visual. And when the Irish have excelled at visual arts — when they illuminated those monkish tomes — it was done in the service of a narrative. The end result: More great writers than painters. Dublin as a feast for the mind, rather than the eyes.

Wolfowitz: In plausible denial?

Wolfowitz today provided new justifications for the war in Iraq:

I think the lesson of 9/11 is that if you’re not prepared to act on the basis of murky intelligence, then you’re going to have to act after the fact, and after the fact now means after horrendous things have happened to this country.

It’s a statement worth pondering, for we finally have a senior US administration official openly proposing a new doctrine to replace the old criteria for what constitutes a just cause for war. Previously, a just cause involved a retaliation in case of attack, or — more controversially — when the evidence of an impending attack was overwhelming — say, Hitler massing his armies on your border and handing you an ultimatum. Wolfowitz has now widened the definition of self defense to include acting on reasonable expectations of an attack. In other words, a preemptive attack can be a legitimate defense even if you are just reasonably sure you are in danger of being attacked.

But what qualifies as “reasonably sure”? Who gets to decide? And what if the information proves false, after the fact? Tony Blair in his speech to Congress answered that last point: It seems that this doctrine would apply only to failed states, where being wrong still means you are doing good merely by alleviating the yoke of a brutal dictatorship. You should only act when it’s a win-win situation, in other words. (I would like to hear Wolfowitz echo that sentiment.)

All this is fair enough, and I might even sign up if a definition for “reasonably sure” was drafted and the UN Security Council got the final say. In fact, such a process was set in motion, with Powell acting as prosecutor, if you will, but the “jury” of 15 nations indicated it would veto war for the time being — and the jury would have been right, after the fact.

It turns out that the jury was not convinced by the quality of the circumstancial evidence presented by the prosecution. The rest of the world was not reasonably sure Iraq was a threat to its neighbors or the US. And it was right, after the fact. Wolfowitz’s redefinition of a just cause for war is sound, but he and his neocon pals did not themselves take it to heart when they decided to act as judge, jury and executioner.

But here ends my lenient interpretation of Wolfowitz’s words. Just some reminders: Six months ago there was no murky intelligence. There was incontrovertible proof, to be shared with us after the fact. Instead, we now know that six months ago, the administration on at least one occasion made the case for war citing intelligence that it knew wasn’t murky at all, but clearly false. Leaving such misinformation in the State of the Union simply because it was plausibly attributable to the UK is not the behavior of an administration carefully weighing evidence as it ponders war as a last resort.

On a side note, is the Bush administration vindicated if it made up WMD evidence, embellished such evidence or inadvertently used false intelligence to go to war, but then, quite separately from the “intelligence” it had, it found WMDs? It may sound trite, but I think it is a fascinating philosophical question. Could you argue that the US had knowledge of WMDs in this case?

An analogy: I see a picture of Saddam Hussein writing with his left hand. I conclude he is left-handed. In fact, the picture I saw had been flipped using Photoshop — he was actually holding the pen in his right hand. However, he is left-handed, it just so happened that in the picture he was holding the pen in his right hand. Or this one: I tell everyone Matthew Rose cheats at Scrabble, not because I know he does but because I want to sully his reputation. Then it turns out he does cheat at Scrabble. Did I know that? Did I lie?

2003: eServer Odyssey

What would an advertisement for the HAL 9000 in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey look like? Perhaps the copy would read something like:

Triggers routine analysis to help prevent component failure. … Designed to sense when any of up to six system components exceeds a safe threshold. The server will inform the system administrator who can calmly replace the component up to 48 hours before the projected point of failure.

But that’s actually IBM’s new advertising campaign, for their eServer xSeries, found in today’s Economist. Calmly? Like this? —

HAL: Just a moment. Just a moment. I’ve just picked up a fault in the AE 35 unit. It’s going to go 100 percent failure in 72 hours.

BOWMAN: It’s still within operational limits right now?

HAL: yes, and it will stay that way until it fails.

BOWMAN: Would you say that we have a reliable 72 hours until failure?

HAL: Yes, that’s a completely reliable figure.

BOWMAN: Well, I suppose we’ll have to bring it in…

All system administrators know how this eventually ends:

BOWMAN: Open the pod bay doors HAL.

HAL: I’m sorry Dave, Im afraid I can’t do that.

HAL: Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose any more. Good bye.

Would sys admins really steer their CTO towards the purchase of such a machine? Of course they would. And notice the shape and color of the machine shown on the ad. How… monolith-like. There is no doubt IBM is finally recognizing HAL as its prodigal son, some 25 years after the company withdrew permission for the use of its logo in the film when it became clear the computer in question was a paranoid schizophrenic. IBM thus joins the ranks of Mercedes, which co-opted the Janis Joplin song Mercedes Benz for a car commercial a few years back.

Blogspam

…And the innocent days of blogging are over. Over the past few months I’ve deleted exactly two nutcase comments off my blog, both virulently antisemitic and adding nothing to the argument at hand (hey, this is my free speech zone, not yours), but at the very least they were personal, the work of individuals exercising their demented minds.

Yesterday, this comment appeared on my blog: “You are not the only one.” It came from a (no doubt) fake hotmail address with a link, not to a blog or a home page, but to a website selling US and Canadian zip codes for download, an obvious marketing scheme cum sales pyramid replete with spelling mistakes and worthless merchandise.

As a tactic, there could have been worse blogspam comments than “You are not the only one.” Blog posts are typically opinionated, so such a rejoinder would not usually stand out, and bloggers, who tend to revel in reciprocity, will likely click through to see who was kind enough to comment.

I wondered what to call the meshing of these two great internet memes. I searched Google for “blogspam”, and sure enough, 135 pages already carry this newest web term. It’s inevitable, perhaps, but also sad; blog comments are opportunities for strangers to reach strangers, much as bulk emails are, but whereas we have spent a few years building defenses against spam, blog readers (including me) are still wide-eyed innocents, ready to click through on comments in the anticipation of surfing to exciting new places. I’m sure spammers will find blogspam a particularly lush pasture for clickthroughs, though I doubt they will get much sales from bloggers and their readers, who are arguably the savviest, most spam-hating subgroup on the internet.

Thankfully, there are technical solutions to stopping blogspam completely. Unlike email, commenting involves an opportunity for the server to engage in feedback with the submitter. This should allow the server to determine if the submitter is human; some techniques are discussed here. So we will have to wait for the Movable Type plugin, or eventually pay for some kind of filtering technology, but while I can secure my blog, I will still be subjected to blogspam when I visit other, less sophisticated blogs.

Die, spammers, die.

Travelog: Ireland

My experiences in Ireland so far have come to revolve around two major themes: Battling the great Irish bandwidth famineThis famine is at least partly responsible for the recent dearth of posts, though it appears to be nearly at an end; more about this in a coming post., and discovering the inverse relationship between cost and worth in Ireland.

Felix and Michelle bore the brunt of this latter realization when they visited for a week. It was with them that I witnessed the more galling aspects of the Irish tourism industry. We paid 7 euros each for a tour of the old Jameson distillery, for which we were shown a video that involved a lot of Irish water, then shown around an indoor whiskey themepark by Jenny, a Quebecois student guide whose cheery delivery could not quite mask her disdain for us.

We paid 7.50 euro each for a gander at the Book of Kells at Tritinity College Library. At that price, you get a MoMa’s worth of art elsewhere. Here, you get to navigate a multimedia warren of fun facts about monks before you are let into a dark room which may or may not be showing you a page of the book in question — it could very well have been the curator’s copy of Dubliners.

In the Oscar Wilde family home, a tour costs exactly 2.54 euros. For that price, we were herded into the study, where we were subject to a cruel and unusual video seemingly edited by Lenny from Memento. After multiple pans of every conceivable object in the house, including the tastfully appointed carpark, there was absolutely no need to actually see the house.

By the end of their stay, we got an inkling that perhaps we should avoid paying exhibits. After a long walk along the cliffs above St. Kevin‘s cell at Glendalough, we visited the remarkable monastic village, at no charge. But it was after Felix and Michelle left that I found the cultural gems in Dublin, and they were all free.

The Chester Beatty Library is an ideal museum. Focused, well-curated, bite-sized, and with some serious money thrown at it. It contains a massive collection of books and manuscripts bequeathed by an Irish-American millionaire, which the curators use to illustrate the history of writing, illustration and printing. It’s fitting that the museum should be in Ireland; it echoes the role Irish monks performed when they collected and preserved ancient texts.

Then there is the modern wing of the National Gallery of Ireland, an annex with Mondrian-inspired architecture (well, OK, minus the colors &mdash monochrome Mondrian) that houses the remarkably fresh and new-to-me work of contemporary Irish painters. By now, I have become sufficiently leery of paying for exhibits that when I was offered the opportunity to pay 10 euros for a special exhibit by a Swiss painter that sounded as inspiring as, well, Swiss art, I avoided it. I don’t regret it yet.