Cold comfort

If Bush says we hate freedom, let him tell us why we didn’t attack Sweden, for example.

Top 10 reasons why Osama Bin Laden didn’t attack Sweden:

10. Couldn’t tell Sweden from Switzerland.

9. Attackers decided to take extended sick leave at 80% pay instead.

8. Stockholm World Trade Center is only seven stories high, and they couldn’t find it.

7. Osama’s illness turns out to have been Stockholm Syndrome.

6. Has been reading a lot of Little Green Footballs, thinks Sweden is a Wahhabist theocracy.

5. WMD attack did occur, but Swedes are immune to surströmming bombs.

4. Because everybody knows Sweden has no army.

3. Will never forget the summer of 1982 in Afghanistan and those long warm nights with Lotta Hedman, that hot Swedish backpacker — especially how she would unravel her blond pigtails as they bathed naked in the Amu Darya while the full moon illuminated the Hindu Kush. He still wakes up in a sweat thinking of her. Sometimes he wonders what has become of her.

2. IKEA furniture easy to transport from cave to cave. Especially likes his Lagom™ brown tarpaulin backdrop and Slarvig™ collapsible desk.

1. Still holding out hope for a Nobel.

Political blogs are from Mars, community blogs are from Venus

Annica Tiger has written two interesting posts (with good comment streams) on women bloggers in Sweden, asking in particular why so few are represented on Bloggforum‘s panelsOm du tänker komma till Bloggforum Stockholm 2004, glöm inte att registrera dig. Och förlåt, men jag hinner inte än om att skriva om viktiga saker på svenska. Nja, jag skulle kunna göra det, men du skulle inte vilja läsa det. Ger mig ett år till.. If roughly 50% of bloggers are women, why are only two out of 15 participants women? Shouldn’t a representative sample of Swedish bloggers have a roughly equal number of men and women?

It should. But Bloggforum is not a representative sample of Swedish bloggers. To explain how this came about, maybe it’s best to ask “Why have Bloggforum at all?” The forum (I think) shouldn’t try to replicate in the flesh what blogging does best digitally — and blogging can adeptly cover a great many issues, for example the very one we’re discussing now. The whole blogging medium is geared towards conversation, so why “blog unplugged” in a forum setting?

Because blogs are somewhat of a closed system in a society that is not yet fully aware of them. Because the conversation about blogging should include those who don’t blog. Because many professions are poised to be affected by the rise of personal publishing, and professionals who are already blogging are the best positioned to help with the transition.

Bloggforum participants, then, reflect the rise of “pro-blogging” in Sweden. In the US, pro blogs include such notables as Gawker, Wonkette, Gothamist, Talking Points Memo, Andrew Sullivan, Instapundit, Daily Kos, Crooked Timber, The Volokh Conspiracy, Matthew Yglesias, Juan Cole and James Lileks. One thing they have in common is that they are read by non-bloggers much more widely than other blogs. The other thing they have in common is that they are predominantly authored by men.

Well, at least many genres of pro blog are. Political opinion bloggers are almost to a man, er, male, with the notable exceptions of Virginia Postrel and Ana Marie Cox on either extreme of the seriousness spectrum. (In contrast, the sexes are more balanced on US newspaper opinion pages). Blogger-professionals, like lawyers and journalists, also tend to be male (while again, the sexes are more balanced in the profession at large). Satire and personality-cult blogs, however, seem to be a female bastion (Wonkette again, Eurotrash, Maccers, Belle de Jour), while community blogs like Gothamist are pretty evenly split.

The Swedish blogosphere has now entered its pro-blogging phase, but not uniformly on all fronts. It is the political and media blogs which are leading the charge, and — as in the US — these are predominantly authored by men. It is this kind of blogging that the current Bloggforum focuses on, not because it is inherently more interesting than the more personal strain of blogging (and certainly not because it is dominated by men), but because it is, right now, more relevant to the debate about whether blogging can change the political and media landscape in Sweden. These are the questions most likely to perk the ears of mainstream media, and hence most likely to raise the profile of blogging, which leads to more readers for all.

In the meantime, I can’t wait for a Stockholm city events blog, or one that dredges the gossip rags and solicits celeb sightings from readers. Or how about a Stockholm restaurant review blog, by an anonymous foodie with an appetite, an expense account and a snarky palate? A Swedish culture blog? — someone should release into the wild interns with attitude to sniff out the good from the bad from the ugly among Stockholm’s gallery and concert offerings. There is already one pioneer, of course: Anna’s still unique fashion/shopping blog. Whoever authors these future blogs — men or women — should be on future Bloggfora.

For what it’s worth, I have a few theories as to why political and media blogs in particular are predominantly male, even while both sexes populate the field:

1) I am biased, and I don’t know it, so I just think there are more men than women authoring these kinds of blogs.

2) Political blogging is by nature an aggressive, competitive sport, prone to combative stances, and men tend to like this environment more than women.

3) Media blogging is by nature all about professional self-promotion, and men are shameless.

4) Women, being mature, don’t depend on ego-affirming site statistics for a sense of self-worth.

I’d love to hear why I am completely off the mark in this post. I’m not all that sure about what I’ve just written.

Sleepwriting

Must. Stay. Awake. For. The. Debate. This effort is very much being helped along by Marc in Berlin who insisted I read over his article on tropical rainforests in zeppelin hangarsHere is the article. when he finished writing it, but who then instead proceeded to procrastinate over on MemeFirst. I did manage to get a gift certificate for iTunes out of it, however, and this soon led to the purchase of a maddeningly boppy song, “I’d rather dance with you” by Bergen’s own Kings of Convenience.

Check out the whole video on iTunes — I am finding it hard to resist the urge to join in with the silly steps, and since the alternative is catatonic sleep, I am grateful.

But the song doesn’t just work at the gut level. The lyrics wink at you as they seduce:

I’d rather dance with you than talk with you
So why don’t we just move into the other room
There’s space for us to shake, and hey, I like this tune

Even if I could hear what you said
I doubt my reply would be interesting for you to hear
Because I haven’t read a single book all year
And the only film I saw, I didn’t like it at all

The music’s too loud and the noise from the crowd
Increases the chance of misinterpretation
So let your hips do the talking
I’ll make you laugh by acting like the guy who sings
And you’ll make me smile by really getting into the swing

See, because even though he’s saying how he’d rather not talk, he is talking; and even though he denies being interesting, she doubts it; and though he pretends to describe, he is actually telling her what to do. Somehow, at 3am, that comes across as profound.

Top ten things I hate about Stockholm, IX

The ninth in an occasional series.
 
Ten: Predatory seating
Nine: Culinary relativism
Eight: Preëmptive planning
Seven: Premature mastication
Six: Irrational discalceation
Five: Radiotjänst i Kiruna AB
Four: Temporal engineering
Three: Tunnelbana vision
Two: Simölacra

I’ve learned a few lessons in life I’d like to pass on.

Don’t drink British wine. Don’t drink Italian beer. Don’t drink cosmopolitans in dive bars, don’t drink Rolling Rock in diva bars. Do as the locals.

Don’t drink decaffeinated coffee. Don’t drink de-alcoholized beer. Don’t eat vegetarian food made to look like meat. Seek out authentic things.

But what to do if these two prescriptions for life clash? What if the locals seek out simulacra? I am referring, of course, to that sad abomination of an acoholic beverage, lätt öl [Swedish], a Swedish class of barely beers, “light” on taste, alcohol and point, a straight-to-bladder production that not even the state alcohol dispensing monopoly, Systembolaget, could be bothered regulating.

And yet Swedes don’t get the hint about what that implies. Every day, at luncheon places all over Sweden, hundreds of thousands will optimistically ask once again for lätt öl by name, just in case that, over night, it might suddenly have developed into something substantive.

It’s hard to describe the lack of taste it has. You know how sometimes, when you buy a coke from a concession stand and the dispenser has almost run out of syrup, you get to drink something with a hint of coke that is actually far worse than just water? Lätt öl is the beer equivalent.

To be honest, I don’t understand why Swedish beer is drunk at all. Sweden has worldbeating vodkas and aquavits and wonderful traditions involving punsch and mulled wine. Swedish beer, on the other hand, is atrocious.

Yes it is, and you know it — there is a reason why you don’t export it. I’m not necessarily saying only Belgians can make good beer — the Germans produce competent brews, even if their restrictive Reinheitsgebot guarantees they’re boring; the Americans have some excellent microbreweries; give them a few more generations as they chisel away at the rough edges, and they will have something that approaches the complexity of the palate of an Orval. But as for Swedish beer, there is no hope, and the whole enterprise should just be put out of its misery.

At least lätt öl consumption has fallen by half over the past ten years, for which we have the EU to thank. Price-sensitive consumers have been getting more booze for their buck by nipping over the border and carting home something realI’ve described the role alcohol plays in Sweden’s social life before.. This upgrading of Swedish drinking habits is encouraging, but Swedish alcohol consumption still ranks below the EU mean — so if Swedes want to bolster their until-now entirely undeserved international reputation as a drinking nation, there is still much work to be done.

I suggest refocusing on core Nordic competencies — bring back Viking meadAnd if you hire Absolut’s marketing geniuses you’ll have another runaway export success on your hands.. Read up on Norse drinking culture, convert Spendrups‘s breweries into meaderies, then start enjoying an alcoholic heritage that is both local and authentic.

Perfect Day 2 (July 23, 2004)

Perfect Day 1 was May 5, 2002.If somebody were to ask me to describe a perfect summer vacation day, it might go something like this: It would be sunny in Ireland, where I’d be, and I would spend the morning in the garden making progress listening to Henning Mankell’s Innan Frosten, in Swedish, on the iPod, while following along in the book, much as I promised Erik I would.

After lunch, I might take the bus into Dublin to pick up my copy of Prime Obsession, which would have been ordered at Hodges Figgis the week before. Then, I’d wade through swarms of Spanish English-language students just released from the day’s classes — all practicing their immaculate Spanish on each other — and make my way to the Irish Film Institute, which would be starting a Richard Linklater retrospective that day with a showing of Before Sunset, the sequel to Before Sunrise, a movie I saw twice in so many days in 1995 — once secretly, in order to avoid the barbs of so-called friends that I was showing the symptoms of terminal hopeless romanticism.

Before Sunset is 80 minutes of real-time conversation between Jesse and Celine as they meet in Paris, not so accidentally, nine years after a first encounter in Vienna in Before Sunrise. A Linklater retrospective would show both films, of course, but I’d resist the tempation to see them chronologically, preferring instead to try to resurrect memories from 1995, much as the protagonists do in Before Sunset. And the movie would stir the heart: perversely, in the intervening years, Celine has gotten herself an MA in international relations, while Jesse has become a novelist — where I am & where I’d like to be. And they’ve both lived in New York. No wonder their duet is even more compelling to me the second time round, if that’s possible.

After dinner, there’d be a public lecture by Roger Penrose — around the corner and down the street — capping a week-long international conference on quantum gravity. Penrose would title his talk Fashion, Faith, and Fantasy in Modern Physical Theories, and he would illustrate it with transparencies of mermaids.

Penrose would point out that the famous (hypothetical) Shrödinger’s cat experiment still leads to a paradox in quantum mechanics: Whenever the cat is both alive and dead, the result of a superposition of possible states for a particle that decides the fate of the cat, there can also be an observer that is both happy and sad, until we observe him (or her). But we, in turn, might also both happy and sad, simultaneously, until observed by an outsider. The boundary for the macroscopic effects of quantum behavior seems to be arbitrary, in other words — or, at least, not well defined. This would be problematic, and hence quantum mechanics, while immensely useful, still requires a measure of faith. Penrose goes on to show a transparency describing an experiment, being built, that should probe this boundary.

cat.jpgpenrosetalk.jpg

And then I’d blog it. And that is exactly how I spent July 23, 2004.

Weekend report

I have seen the future, and it is taller than me. On the occasion, it was also drunker — the occasion being Walpurgis, the location being Karolinska Institute, the medical university where students traditionally ring in spring with a concert fueled by cheap beerEverywhere else in Sweden, this is the night to build a big bonfire with last year’s IKEA furniture, in order to make room for this year’s models. Not so with Stockholm students, who are far too jaded for such blatantly participatory pursuits..

I got in under cover of accompanying Jenny and Maria, who technically aren’t students either, but who at least can plausibly pretend to be. Once in, they were pretty quickly the center of attention of a pack of male students from Idrottshögskolan, Sweden’s sports universityWhat could they possibly be teaching there? Steroid research? Post-graduate swimming? The physics of the hockey puck?.

This group made Eurotrash look like Lady Liberty. They wore soccer jerseys, no doubt an homage to Beckham, but a majority of them also wore one or more gloves in an unabashedly retro-80’s way. And they danced extremely well while simultaneously not being gay. In sweden, it turns out even the jocks are metrosexualApologies for the slight delay in blogging this, but I have added a third cardinal rule to dictate my blogging behaviour: 1: Absolutely no blogging while drunk. 2: Absolutely no blogging while hung over. 3: Absolutely no blogging while it is glorious outside. All three rules were invoked this weekend..

Further burnishing the eurotrash credentials of the night was the band, Lambretta, a semi-famous (so I am told) Swedish thrash-pop act that sounds exactly like Transvision Vamp back in 1989.

Watching them, however, was more of a challenge than concerts used to be. Over the years, my 6 foot 2 frame had afforded me some prime views — in 1992, for example, attending a Guns and Roses concert in Sevilla was like standing in a crowd of smoky midgets. But tonight, perhaps half the room was taller than me. (The New Yorker recently explained why.) If it is important in Sweden that you not stand out, I think I am going to do extremely well here.

Top ten things I hate about Stockholm, IV

The fourth in an occasional series.
 
Ten: Predatory seating
Nine: Culinary relativism
Eight: Preëmptive planning
Seven: Premature mastication.

For some time, it has been apparent to me that the media here are pushing brunch as the new cool thing for Stockholmers to do on weekends. Newspapers, city guides, television and radio have all decided that if it’s good enough for the Sex and the City cast, this should be the next big cultural import from New York. But there is an element of willful obliviousness involved: Swedes invented brunch generations ago, and in fact brunch every weekday, when they take an hour off from work for food. At 11.30 am.

Stockholmers might think they are eating lunch then, but they’d be wrong. Food consumed at 11.30 am can be wonderful, but it is not lunch. Lunch is what the Italians have at 1.30 pm. It’s what the Spanish have between 2 and 5 pm. That said, the Swedish weekday brunch is a lovely ritual — all the restaurants cater to it, friends meet in the old town to catch up and swap gossip, mamma-ledig (“mommy-free”) mothers on their year-long leave from work cart their offspring in SUV-sized buggies to meet admiring pals, and officemates can flirt without really calling it a date. In fact, Swedish brunch fulfills all the same social functions as the New York version, with the added benefit that you get to do it during office hours.

So, to clarify, I don’t hate the brunching tradition as such, but I do bemoan its misclassification as lunch, and one additional opportunity cost: The resultant temporal shift of all mealtimes. Swedes are constantly hungry ahead of the rest of Europe — their eating habits are, in fact, synchronized with those of Iraqis. Walk home from work shortly after 5 pm and you will see Stockholmers sitting at restaurant tables, ordering. The tail end of a three-martini lunch, perhaps? No, the start of middag, which they believe is dinner.

Clearly, dinner is not served at 5 pm. This is obvious to all foreigners. For example, Ayse and Cemo, who are visiting from Istanbul on a baby-goods shopping spree this weekend, were asked by Joachim, a Swede, what time they’d like to meet for dinner tonight. They said 8:30 pm. Joachim nearly gargled his café latte. He had 6 pm in mind. Because it was Saturday.

Stockholmers, stop being so defensive about your bizarre eating habits; stop trying to shoehorn your meals into accepted global norms, and celebrate your otherness! I suggest trying to export the 5 pm meal to New York as something sophisticated and maybe even a touch decadent, as in “look how early I can get off work.” New York restaurants would take to it in an instant: they could always use an extra sitting. If Carrie and the girls had another season on HBO, they’d definitely be meeting for lunner, or maybe they’d call it dinch.

Public service announcement

This week it was the annual joke show on NPR’s A Prairie Home Companion, that liberal gem of a radio show hosted by Garrison Keillor. Bush got plenty of come-uppance (What were the best three years of George Bush’s life? Grade 5), but Keillor is generous with his humor, and flawless in his delivery, so you should really listen to the whole show rather than just read the list of the best jokes he collected for the year.

Practically nobody emerged unscathed: not Kerry (John Kerry walks into a bar. The bartender says, “Why the long face?”), not Martha Stewart, not Episcopalians (Why can’t Episcopalians play chess? They can’t tell the difference between a bishop and a queen), not Unitarians (How do you get a Unitarian family to leave town? You burn a question mark on their front lawn) not Michael Jackson, not Janet Jackson, not even Ronald Reagan (President Reagan didn’t vote in the California election because recall’s not his thing any more), not Helen Keller, not the Amish and not the blind (How does the blind parachutist know when he’s getting close to the ground? The leash goes slack).

And certainly not the Swedes, for which Keillor has a soft spot:

PP: A Swedish guy likes to go to bed with two women, so when he falls asleep they can talk to each other. He is so repressed, he blushes if someone says “Intersection”. Sometimes he’ll get drunk and go downtown and spend the night in a warehouse.
 
GK: A warehouse?
 
PP: They’re bad spellers, too. [Script]

Well, okay, it was funny when he said it. You can complain here.

Top ten things I hate about Stockholm, III

The third in an occasional series.
 
Ten: Predatory seating
Nine: Culinary relativism
Eight: Preëmptive planning.

In New York, planning a typical night’s entertainment went something like this: “Matthew, how about a game of Scrabble in St. Dymphnas tonight?” “Okay.” If it wasn’t Matthew, it’d be Itay, or Zach, or a combination of the three.

I could handle that. My event horizon rarely extended 24 hours into the future. It didn’t need to — there’d always be something popping up, and people’s schedules were as fluid as mine. I was free to pursue the simple life of task-based socializing: Find something to do and then find somebody to do it with.

Do not try this in Stockholm. In Stockholm, planning goes something like this:

“Let’s go for dinner.”

“Okay, how about two weeks from Friday?”

“[WTF???] How about two weeks from when hell freezes over?”

“I can’t, it’s West Wing on TV.”

“How about the Wednesday after pigs fly?”

“Å, but I’ll have to see if we can get a babysitter.”

“Å, I’ll pencil you in then.“Å,” pronounced “har” as the pirates do but with the h and r silent, is a passive yes in Swedish. As in, “I have no objections to the proposed course of events, do you?” You’d be surprised how much conversation is superfluous once you have the letter å at your disposal. The reason is that, unknown to most linguists, Swedish is actually a tonal language. “Å!” is an entire passive-aggressive tirade reduced to a letter. “Å?” is the Swedish equivalent of “WhatEVER.” And you thought Swedes just didn’t say much.

The reason tonight is not feasible is because Stockholmers have all preëmptively booked each other weeks in advance. And the only reason why is because everybody else is planning preëmptively. It’s the temportal equivalent to the predatory seating problem, identified previously. There is no shortage of things to do in Stockholm, nor people to do them with, but try to be spontaneous and you will be doing so at home with the remote control, and the Finnish channel as your nemesis.

What Stockholm needs to adopt, en masse, is a just-in-time approach to managing social obligations. As things stand, there is a non-negligible risk your date gets run over by a bus in the interval between planning and consummation. The solution is obvious, Stockholm: For better living, reduce your time-to-meatmarket.