State of the blogosvea

Amazing how not writing for a week tongue-ties my three typing fingers. You can take the preceding sentence as evidence of that. At least there is behind-the-scenes progress on the blog redesign front. Just you wait — BLOG@STEFANGEENS.COM will soon the best-designed blog you’ve ever seen. Jason Kottke will be shamed back to the drawing board with his transitional XHTML; 456 Berea Street will never dare slide another door again; SimpleBits will go green with envy before you switch its sylesheet, and Tomas Jogin will give up blogging outright.

If the CSS references above stump you, you’re in luck. But since I’ve had CSS, XML and other TLAs sloshing around in my skull for the last week or so, let me just quickly put my musings down while they’re still fresh.

About Jason’s redesign: He’s on target. As you can see from the current designs of this blog and MemeFirstBut please don’t look behind the curtains of my site just yet. It’s a mess back there., I agree completely that boxes = bad. It’s the classic trap of doing something because new technology allows it. Having black text swimming in whitespace just like in a book is not a failure of the imagination; it is not an inability to embrace the possibilities of a new medium; rather, it is a recognition that over the centuries, printers have honed in on the most efficient means of passing information from the page to the mind. Sure, magazines will play with labor-intensive one-off design extravanganzas for the same reason peacock feathers exist, but for workaday reading — the daily habit — I want my text clean and sparse, and not upstaged by design flourishes that look good at first blush but soon thereafter proceed from cute to haggard. The less often you update a design, the more Lutheran it should beThat’s be a good name for a design bureau, come to think of it: Lutheran..

The thing I like least about SimpleBits is that option to change the color of the banner. Other than showing that this is possible, it serves no purpose. It certainly does not enhance my user experience. Color is also used frivolously on another noted recent redesign — that of Stopdesign. Each page gets a completely different color scheme. It’s too much; and it suggests indecisionWhy not have sitewide theme changes once every season instead?. Both SimpleBits and Stopdesign are the personal pages of possibly the most proficient web designers out there right now, and so they might feel compelled to crank it up — again, the peacock feather effect — but I do wish Stopdesign’s Douglas Bowman had taken a page out of his Blogger redesign and kept it simpleOne final parting observation: I don’t like three equally spaced columns, as Stopdesign now sports on some pages. The overabundance of symmetry jars, and I’m not given a sufficiently large clue as to where I should start exploring the page..

Oh, sorry, this was meant to be a post about the state of the Swedish blogosphere. I’ll try to keep it short from here on in.

Over the past few months, the Swedish blog scene has grown, and the result is that we now find ourselves at the cusp of the third great epoch of Swedish blogging, and there are some good English-language specimens to point out.

Generalizing now: The first epoch was characterized by a predominance of technologists and early adopters, as was the case everywhere else. They mainly blogged about technology and self-referentially about blogging, but this was a good thing, because it helped mature the technology sufficiently for the onset of the second epochI blogged the second epoch here.: The rise of the journal-ists, who embraced the ease of the blog medium and used it as a tool for personal writing on topics that mostly had nothing to do with technology.

And now, in the past six months, we’ve seen single-issue pro blogs come of age in Sweden. Some of these are predominantly in English: JKL Blog, for example, is group authored by a Swedish strategic communications firm. Media Culpa is penned by a Swedish PR professional. And pro-globalization writer Johan Norberg has been blogging for a just over a year nowSome Swedish language-only media/politics pro bloggers: Gudmundson, Erixon, Lindqvist Arrue., so he was a little ahead of the curve. We’re still waiting on the emergence of a Swedish Gawker or Andrew Sullivan, but to be fair, getting paid to blog in a language other than English sounds somewhat of a tall order right now. There just isn’t a critical mass yet of Swedish blog readers who aren’t also blog authors.

Finally, want to remember what web publishing was like circa 1997, before blogging? Take a look at The Local, an English-language news site about Sweden that launched three months ago: Once a week, it publishes a new issue with a roundup of the week’s stories in the Swedish media, translated and given a contextual spin.

What’s frustrating about The Local is that the publishers position the content right for their intended audienceThey have a good English-language overview of the Knutby trial, for example., but steadfastly ignore every lesson learned about web publishing over the past 7 years. Publishing “issues” is what web sites did before they realized this was a scarcity induced habit in the print world that has no justification on the web. Not publishing articles on the web as soon as they are ready means news is staler than it should be, for no reason.

Instead, if The Local were to adopt an irregular publishing schedule dictated by the availability of news, this would mean readers tend to visit more often, which means more impressive numbers to show advertisers — which The Local says it is trying to attract. And what’s with the reliance on email as a publishing tool? You can even get “bulk subscriptions” via email (?). Email is completely passé as a one-to-many communications technology — RSS syndication is the way to go on that front. Basically, this website needs to become a blog ASAP. When it does, I suspect it will become successful.

Venuspassagen 2004

Stockholm is perfectly positioned to see the transit of venus across the face of the sun, currently underway, but a stubborn cloud cover is obliterating every hint of the event. In fact, the weather’s been remarkably crappy here for all of May and June.
 
We don’t have to wait too long for the next transit, which takes place on June 6, 2012, but for which Stockholm is not well positioned (I’m sure the weather will be great, as a result). Japan and Australia will be the place to be.
transit.jpgJävla vädret! Venus stannar inför solen för första gång i 122 år och det regnar i Stockholm. Flest av de webcasts fungerar inte, eller inte är live, eller har för många besökare, men här finns en som går: Centro de Observação Astronómica no Algarve har en bild som uppdateras.

Åtminstone behöver vi inte vänta 122 år till. Nästa Venuspassage är 6 juni, 2012, men skall inte ses från Sverige; bara från Australien eller Japan. Därför kan jag göra världens bästa long-range väderprognos: Det ska vara solig i Stockholm 6 juni, 2012kl 11.45: Sol i Stockholm! Och jag har sett passagen. Använda 2 svarta diapositiv och du också får titta på solen. Venus är liten, förresten.. Man kan planera nästnästa bloggpicnic utan bekymmer.

PS. Venuspassagen finns tills kl 13.22 i Stockholm, ifall vädret blir bättre.

Finns caféer med trådlös bredband i Stockholm?

I slutet av min tid i New York brukade jag köpa ett kaffe att ta med från Café Pick-me-up, sätta mig med min dator i Tompkins Square park och surfa via donerad trådlös bredband från grannar.

Jag har inte ännu kunnat göra samma sak här in Stockholm. Det är inte så viktigt i 8 av 12 månader, men just nu skulle det vara härligt att kunna skriva eller kolla e-post i solen på eftermiddagen.

Känner ni till caféer i Stockholm som har trådlös bredband? Var man kan sitta ute i timmar med en bärbar dator? Eller parker där det finns ett öppet wi-fi nätverk? Jag vill inte frilansa hemma när vädret är så fint ute. Tack i förväg!

Commodifying Denton, Cont.

One thing I glossed over in my previous post on business models for blogs, now that I think about it, is that Nick Denton and Jason Calacanis do provide one service that individual bloggers trying to monetize their readership don’t have easy recourse to: By owning the revenue stream of multiple blogs, Denton and Calacanis spread their risk, and so can offer their talent a measure of job security. Denton pays a salary, while Calacanis lets you keep the first $1000 profit your site makes from the ads he sells and 50% beyond that, if I remember the NY bloggers talk correctly.

This is similar to how venture capitalists operate, except that real VC projects involve large sunk costs. With blogs, the only non-negligible costs are bloggers’ wages and the effort expended trying to sell readerships to advertisers. Depending on how aggressive Denton and Calacanis are in weeding out underperforming blogs, the cost of failure can be quite low, and hence also their overall risk, leaving them with a generous upside. It’s the size of this upside we’re all wondering about.

Felix points out it’s easy for Denton to fire a blogger. But the same is true for Calacanis. Should he decide to jettison a blogger, I believe all he needs to do is mail him a CD with his aggregated content and restart the blog with a new faceSo, Felix, basically you’re wrong.. I don’t think either venture blogger (VB?) could or should do this without good reason, though, lest the stable get antsy. Their talent musn’t live in fear that a stale patch after a good run lands them out on the street.

Commodifying Nick Denton

Greg Lindsay’s article in Business 2.0 on Nick Denton — an unauthorized mini-biography of sorts of blogging’s greatest living impresario — irked the object of its disaffection sufficiently into penning a barbed retort, to which born-again ethicist Felix adjoined his qualms about ratting on sources, which in turn prompted a Lindsay rebuttal (appended to Felix’s post), and fortuitously, a Young Manhattanite interview with Lindsay today. If we could just find a way to monetize these blogfights; put the ad in ad hominem, so to speakNote to self: Keep good ideas to self. And stop blogging notes to self..

Before I get to the original idea in this post, here are my two öre on Lindsay’s article. I do get the feeling that Lindsay wanted to give Denton a bit of his own snarky medicine, though I am not sure if he navigated with expertise the fine line between snark and whinge. Lindsay launches into a bloggy first-person narrative about being shut out by Denton, about no longer being mentioned by Gawker, and then about possibly being manipulated by Denton into writing about him despite every sign to the contrary. Denton must be a psychological genius, or else Lindsay is having an unrequited journalistic crush. This would explain the bitter flattery, and the outing of correspondence. Classic jilted-lover behavior. Still, that’s no excuse: reporters musn’t take a shut-out personally, especially if the subject later agrees to endure a round of questions.

But the Lindsay article does contain a nugget (which he puts in backets). It homes in on what effect I think Denton hopes the advent of negligible-cost mass publishing is having on traditional media:

[Denton] launched a company called Moreover, whose goal was to aggregate on one site all the world’s news, disintermediating most of his former profession. (This is a theme; when I first met Denton before working on this piece, he promised that Gawker would commoditize [sic] my then-job of media reporter.)

Update 2004-05-24: Doh, it’s commodify, not commoditize. And I went and titled the post wrong as well. All corrected now, both here and in the next post.If blogging commodifies reporters and disintermediates editors and publishers in traditional media — mainly by sampling, riffing on and linking to their original work exactly as this post is doing — then there is indeed a wave for Denton to ride.

The trouble is, why can’t the revolution eat its children? Why shouldn’t we bloggers in turn try to commodify Denton’s job as impresario? That’s the riddle Denton is still trying to solve. Compared to that, launching successful blogs must be easy.

Denton’s blog problem is that he is very good at creating something that is very hard to own: Buzz. His touch now guarantees a new blog 50,000 eyeball pairs on launch day. With that kind of send-off, an interesting blog — and those in Denton’s stable are certainly that — is guaranteed to ascend the blogpile. But this is where Denton’s indispensible contribution ends. The authors become niche celebrities and eclipse the brand while Denton tries to sell their readers to advertisers. And anybody can do this part of his job.

Officially, at least, Denton is banking on bloggers just wanting to be hacks:

I ask Denton what will happen to the next editor who decides he or she wants a piece. He explains that since he has no plans to take his company public, he won’t offer equity positions. “I’m a traditionalist: I believe that writing is a job and writers should get paychecks. It would be entirely bogus to offer people empty revenue-share promises or meaningless equity.”

But the evidence is that his authors quickly make their reputations, which they then cash in elsewhere: Elizabeth Spiers did so, Gizmodo’s Pete Rojas (now of Engadget) did so, and Choire Sicha is doing so (at the very least getting all manner of writing gigs on the side on the strength of his performance at Gawker).

Rival blog entrepreneur Jason Calacanis‘s approach attempts to sidestep the challenge facing Denton: Let the bloggers do their own clawing to the top, but run the stable and give them a cut of the ad profits. For those who have already made it, like Rojas, this proves to be a better deal. In his particular case, Denton’s heavy lifting is now being monetized by Calacanis.

Denton is trying to ward off these threats by strengthening the brand at the expense of the author, much in the same way Dick Wolf made the characters in Law & Order first and foremost plot devices, easily replacable and hence cheaper. His latest, Defamer, for example, is anonymous. We’ll see if it works. Otherwise, Denton will need to resign himself to a high turnover of talent that blogs for him for low pay but high exposure. Removing the personal voice from a blog is not an option.

It’s possible that as the business models adapt, we end up with the same compensatory solution as traditional media where names attract audiences: Iron-clad contracts that stipulate how long a blogger must edit a Denton-branded site, so that Denton gets his return on investment. Is it time for a dotcom era non-compete clause yet?

It’s also possible, however, that a third way develops, a better deal for bloggers than what either Denton or Calacanis can offer as their sites become popular. Calacanis asks 50% for what is essentially an advertising salesman’s job. Shouldn’t his percentage be closer to that of an agent? Why can’t several successful blog authors band together and employ the services of one advertising salesperson, working on commission? Or why can’t an advertising sales freelancer offer to sell ads for a site he’s had expressions of interest in?

Gothamist has a DIY version going, selling their own ads alongside Google ads, MarketBanker text ads, and merchandise, netting them $1,500-$2,000 a month, maybe, with a potential to double that. What they should really try to do is generate economies of scale by offering to sell ads on behalf of other, similar blogs, on a commission of, say, 25%. It would be like Google ads, but with banner ads by local companies aimed at a local market — a service Google can’t provide (yet).

Gothamist’s authors are clearly netting more than than they would under either blog entrepreneur. The disintermediation of Denton and Calacanis in this case could well become a popular model. But is this so surprising? Negligible-cost publishing was always meant to tip the balance in favor of the writing talent. Wasn’t this supposed to mean the talent would own the revenue stream?

PS. I am still curious as to why Denton does not believe in group blogs. Felix promised to ask him, but I have not heard back. Group blogs might offer several advantages over individual blogs as a marketable product: with many authors, quality is more consistent, vacations have little impact, and individual time requirements are far less, allowing for moonlighting by real professionals who actually have something to say, and who might appreciate some pocket money but are not expecting a proper salary out of it. Maybe, from Denton’s perspective, MC-ing a group blog would be too much like herding cats. That doesn’t dismiss group blogs as competitors, however.

Apocalypse Nöw, II

Yes I am recycling titles. You can read Apocalypse Nöw I, about surströmming, here.Göran Svensson looks over his shoulder as he pilots his chopper low over Vietnam’s dense forest canopy. Beside him, his buddy mans the machine gun, strafing intermittently out the open cabin at nothing in particular, just like in the movies. “It’s the perfect shoot-em up,” Göran says too loudly, on account of his headphones. He should be paying more attention to his flying — his helicopter catches some branches and lurches for the ground. He survives; but his buddy does not.
 
Ten seconds later, after suffering a time penalty, they’re back in the game. Göran, a twenty-something engineering student, is sitting to attention before a …

Read the rest of my article on computer gaming in Sweden on Sweden.se, minus the above first paragraph, which was edited out on account that Swedes do not revel in violence (or maybe they are better helicopter pilots than that?). Writing this article was a lot of fun, but my style may have suffered a bit as it is a uniformly positive piece, devoid of the cynical turns of phrase which I know and love. (Also, links were removed from the text and grouped together at the bottom of the piece — it feels odd to have written someting online without links in obvious places). Feel free to point out mistakes I made and clarifications you might have.

Swedish Research News

srnlogo.gif

Here’s what I was up to over the weekend: Readying Swedish Research News, a new site that syndicates news about discoveries and innovations made by researchers at Swedish universities.

It’s something of an experiment, and its continued existence will depend on whether it is useful to, and hence used by, a community of readers. The experiment involves trying to find better ways of collecting and then disseminating existing information, so that it has more impact.

Swedish universities tend to put news of their research successes on their own individual websites — always in Swedish, sometimes in English. Until recently, there was no central repository of Swedish research news in English, making it difficult for non-Swedish speakers to keep tabs on the fruits of Swedish research. A few months ago, with the help of the Swedish Research Council, Study in Sweden began carrying aggregated items on its site.

But the content management system behind Study in Sweden is not blog-savvy. And the news items do not get pride of place, as the site’s focus lies elsewhere. What is lacking are the features that make such news accessible to readers: RSS and Atom newsfeeds, the ability to automatically ping other sites, categorization, and commentingCheck out how the Americans aggregate their research news. Research news in Swedish is available here, but it too lacks newsfeeds..

You can find all these features on Swedish Research News. Now, every time Study in Sweden receives a new item from the Swedish Research Council, it will be edited and posted to both sites. Basically, Swedish Research News is an attempt to bring the link-generosity at the heart of the blogging mindset into an institutional setting via a back-door. If it works, over time the site will become more official-lookingOne caveat: The news is often written by the researchers themselves, and hence is a bit press releasy, and usually has been translated from Swedish with varying degrees of success. Eventually, it is hoped more time will be spent polishing the prose..

So go and have a look at the site. Then, please provide feedback. In addition, consider forwarding news of this site to people who might enjoy reading it or be in a position to contribute to it. Currently, news is heavily tilted towards the sciences. Research news from humanities faculties is very welcome, however.

Ideally, one day, universities will submit their own stories directly to this site for vetting, editing and publication. But that will only happen if Swedish Research News turns out to be of use. Meanwhile, help get the word out.

For better blogging…

Yesterday, the amount of comment spam here and on MemeFirst quite simply got ridiculous. Barely 9 months after getting (and blogging) a first instance, and despite in the meantime removing every possible incentive to posting such spam, volume started growing exponentially as automated spam delivery mechanisms exploiting Movable Type’s standard commenting scripts got more sophisticated. Over the past month, the use of randomly generated emails and rotating IP addresses has allowed spammers to easily circumvent MT’s built-in defences at a rapid clip.

Myself, I was waiting for MT 3.0’s upgraded comment filtering technology. In the meantime, MT-Blacklist, a plug-in that filters URLs for proscribed content, has made it harder for spam to make it through, though not impossible, especially if the sites being promoted by spam use conventional words in their URLs. And, though spammers now have to continuously change the content of their spam, they can still usually get away with bombarding a large number of blogs before they all update their blacklist or the blacklist clearinghouse gets updated. In that sense, MT-Blacklist also chases after a moving target, much like banning IP addresses is ineffective against a spammer continuously changing her IP address.

But last night, as my list of recent comments swelled with the labor of the dregs of humanity, I was willing to settle for something quick and dirty to solve the specific problem of automated spamming engines afflicting my blog. This is what I came up with — and it only takes two minutes to install.

The idea was to personalize my blog’s comment submission process so that a spammer needs to either post spam in person or else manually tweak his comment submission engine so that it works specifically for my blog. Basically, it becomes as annoying for him to post spam as it is for me to remove it. With the burden shared in this way, I’m guessing the spammer won’t bother with my blog, as I care a hell of a lot more about it than he does. And if a spammer visits my site, examines my comment submission process and manually tweaks his engine, I simply alter my process. I feel their pain, and it feels good.

The hack involves requiring a human mind to complete a simple instruction, such as “type the letter ‘A’ in this textbox” or “Type the third letter of this sentence in the textbox,” before MT accepts the accompanying comment. Here’s how:

In your cgi-bin folder, navigate to and edit the file cgi-bin/lib/MT/App/Comments.pm. Do a search for the following piece of code:

if (!$q->param(‘text’)) {

return $app->handle_error($app->translate(“Comment text is required.”));

}

Replace this with:

if (!$q->param(‘text’)) {

return $app->handle_error($app->translate(“Comment text is required.”));

}

## my addition

unless ($q->param(‘spam’) eq ‘A’) {

return $app->handle_error($app->translate(“Type the anti-spam text exactly as shown.”));

}

## my addition

Save and close. Now go to the templates screen in your Movable Type user interface, and make sure that all templates that allow you to submit comments have the following HTML snippet added to the comment submission form (I placed mine just above the comment textbox):

<label for=”spam”>Today’s anti-spam measures are brought to you by the letter “A”. Please type it here:</label> <input id=”spam” name=”spam” />

In standard builds of MT the templates you want to alter are: Individual Entry Archive, Comment Listing Template, Comment Preview Template and Comment Error Template.

What happens now is that when a comment is submitted, MT checks that the accompanying question is answered correctly; if it is, the comment is accepted. The question is asked in the HTML, the answer is found in the Comments.pm code I addedAdvanced MT users: It’s actually a lot simpler to put that HTML snippet into a template module and to refer to the module wherever a template contains a comment submission form. This way, when it is time to change the question/answer pair, you only need to alter the HTML in one spot. More about MT modules here.
 
Update 2004-05-19: This hack is not compatible with MT-Blacklist. MT-Blacklist is not a proper plugin in that it completely bypasses Comments.pm with its own comment-handling files. Altering Comments.pm as described here has no effect as long as MT-Blacklist is installed.
 
Update 2004-09-10: It is compatible with MT-Blacklist, as the comments below attest to. (I don’t use it though. There really is no need now.)
 
Update 2004-10-29: Strang’s Blog has a post that explains how to get this to work for MT 3.11 templates.
.

Of course, a spammer can still visit my blog, determine the required answer for the anti-spam question, and then program his submission engine accordingly. But the catch is that he has to do this manually every time I change the question/answer pair. You can alter the question/answer pair whenever you want: in Comments.pm, just replace the ‘A’ in the above example with whatever letter, number or word you want, as long as it is inside single quotes; and also make sure the question in the HTML snippet leads unambiguously to that answer.

The reason this is not a plug-in is because I don’t know Perl. I guessed-and-pasted this out of desperation, but it works like a charm. If I knew Perl I would probably build a library of question/answer pairs that I can rotate at will. And, additionally, if you are willing to forgo having comment submissions on the static Individual Entry Archive template in favor of using only the pop-up comment templates, which render MT tags on the fly, you could build a system that automatically rotates the question/answer pairs every X hours or days, overlapping successive pairs so that commenters on the crux of an changeover are not abandoned.

The more that people personalize their comment submission forms, the less spammers can exploit the standard MT comment submission process.

Stockholm: Random observations

Today was the first perfect spring day, as bright as a day can get, and Stockholmers walked about their city as if they had just been released from a dark room, squinting, and a little dazed. Tourists were easy to spot — they were the ones dressed rationally, whereas the locals were shedding layers like eskimos in a sauna. And not a leaf on the trees yet, though that should change within hours.

make23.gifWaiting for a train at Stockholm Södra Friday night, I started staring at the platform pavement. Penrose tiles! These were invented (or discovered, depending on your take on mathematics) by Roger Penrose: He figured out how to cover a surface with only two different kinds of tiles in a way that never repeats. It sounds impossible, but it’s not. Penrose used two kinds of rhombi, and then added some specific instructions as to how they are supposed to be placed next to each other. The result is a complex mathematical structure made from simple rules, putting it in the same seductive league as the Mandelbrot set and Wolfram’s Rule 30.

In Södra, the rhombi are disguised, but cleverly so: By curving the edges in specific ways, Penrose’s rules are embodied in the shapes: It was impossible for the workmen building the platform to accidentally create a repeating pattern (unless they were to use only one shape exclusively, I think, but I am not sure about that, and need to go have another look).

I started to wonder whether for each separate segment of pavement covered in tiles, the ratio of the frequency of the two shapes was similar. Luckily, the train arrived. Just now, I found out that for large enough areas, this ratio converges on the golden mean. That is deep in ways I have not yet begun to fathom.

I love public architecture that strives for obscure details that hide underfoot, literally. Next time, I will take my camera, take a picture, and post it here.

Battlefield Baroque

I’ve been using the latest version of Microsoft Office for Windows a few weeks now at work. Save your money and stick to whatever previous version of Office you have.

We (and by we I mean you who ordered this software for me) should have seen the warning signs in the last upgrade: Office is entering its Baroque period, or is it Rococo already? I now count four (4) [IV] {oooo} icons in the menu bars of Outlook that use a magnifying glass. Only one of them actually lets you search through your mail. The others will either: scan your messages for viruses, toggle message content preview, or show you a print preview. Can you guess which is which?

icon1.gif icon2.gif icon3.gif icon4.gif

Sorry, no answers from me, I already forgot which is which and I can’t be bothered to look it up. Elsewhere — for example when you are writing an email or using Word — the search function is represented by binoculars, something which I use all the time when reading a book or newspaper closely.

The only tangible change to my daily MS genuflections is the layout of the main window in Outlook. You can now have the windows split horizontally, instead of vertically, which makes sense on screens that are wider rather than taller.

Meanwhile, Microsoft is continuing its attempts to turn email into something other than standard plain text messages. I spent the first 15 minutes of my time with the new Outlook turning off receipt requests (it’s rude, OK?), HTML rendering and RTF style defaults. And, bizarrely, the email window pane now looks like a print preview screen:

screen.gif

I’ve noticed from screenshots that the upcoming new Mac version of Office has the same shaded border too. Why should I want to think of my email as a printed document? It’s a waste of screen space and yet one more mixed metaphor to battle.

Talking of battles, earlier this week I spent a few hours playing Battlefield Vietnam, the month-old successor to Battlefield 1942, at a gaming cafe here in Stockholm for research purposesI kid you not. You’ll read about it in a month or so.. It is a magnificent game for networked team play. One odd sensation came from an unexpected feature of the game: Sometimes you play as Vietcong, and take potshots at Americans as they try to implement US foreign policy.

I’ve played my fair share of multiplayer WWII 3D shootem-ups, in which being a German soldier is fairly run-of-the-mill; somebody’s got to be the Indian. Simulate conflicts that are closer to the present day, however, and a gamer’s ironic detachment is no longer readily buttressed by historical distance. Still, at the rate these games are coming to market, I do not think I will be waiting 30 years before I get the opportunity to play Capture the Flag as a Sunni on a Falluja map.