Feed me

Aftonbladet has now also noticed that an English-language AFP newsfeed about Swedish news published on Sweden.se contained a story which names the [now ex-] chief suspect in Anna Lindh’s murderRecap: In Sweden, voluntary press ethics rules prohibit the naming of suspects, including the the name of the suspect held in connection with Swedish Foreign Minister Anna Lindh’s murder.
 
Update 16.30 CET: Svensson is released, and no longer under suspicion for Anna Lindh’s murder. A new suspect is arrested.
. For an ostensibly straight news article, it is quite drenched in editorial innuendo. It is also unintentionally funny in that it never mentions the website, the government agency responsible, or the name of the person interviewed. At this rate, there won’t be much left to name soon.

Aftonbladet draws all the wrong conclusions. It should have concluded that trying to keep foreign media out of Sweden is like trying to bail the Titanic. Information flows are now so deeply integrated across borders that country-specific self-censorship rules based on a time before the internet are impossible to implement without severely disrupting the free flow of information.

Instead, Aftonbladet has concluded that because it follows — technically — a voluntary code of press ethics, everybody else should too, internet be damned. Nevermind that the Swedish Institute (SI) is not an accredited news organization. Nevermind that AFP is a foreign news organization. Nevermind that the rules, again, are voluntary. And certainly nevermind that Aftonbladet is the paper most responsible for smearing suspect Svensson’s reputation with irrelevant sensationalism.

In a way, it is understandable that Aftonbladet does not want to suffer competitively for this self-censorship (even if it has profited handsomely by being the most aggressive dirt digger). But because there is no legal basis for the enforcement of these ethics rules on non-journalistic entities and foreign media, the paper has had to appeal to a sense of moral outrage to try to get these organizations to fall into line. The article itself makes clear that Aftonbladet was willing to tolerate one transgression on the part of SI, especially as the offending article was manually removed, but decided to “out” the agency after the feed was automatically updated overnight by AFP, and the article reappeared. Straight news?

A more cynical reading of the paper’s actions would be this: Now that Svensson’s private life has been effectively exposed by Aftonbladet, and it is beginning to feel the heat for its editorial decisions, organizations that name the suspect in completely legitimate articles become welcome scapegoats.

Or how about this reading: By trying to expand the reach of these rules, through moral suasion, to non-traditional news outlets, Aftonbladet is doing its part to preserve the existence of a cozy, uncompetitive Swedish media landscape. In other words, what Aftonbladet is really saying in the article is, “how dare a foreign entity like AFP report our news back at us through non-standard channels.”

If the end result is that AFP news in English about Sweden no longer appears on Sweden.se, it would be a victory for the status quo. But it would be a pyrrhic victory, for the internet is clearly moving in this direction. The site-based publishing paradigm is turning into feed-based publishing; Sites are more and more becoming amalgams of disparate syndicated information sources. Sweden.se is just the beginning.

Extreme physics

I’m a sucker for popular literature on mathematics and evolutionary biology, and were it not for RyanAir’s grossly unfair 15kg luggage allowance I would now be finishing this book on the Riemann Hypothesis instead of leaving it in my parents’ library in Dublin. Or maybe not. I felt it wasn’t well written, and now Amazon reviewers are finding all kinds of faults with it, so perhaps I will start again with Prime Obsession, which incidentally would be a good brand name if anyone ever decides to market perfume to geeks.

Extreme physics is another topic I lap upThis link to a New York Times article should be permanent, courtesy of a pact with Userland and the NYT. It’s an officially sanctioned back door, of sorts, the result of a NYT keenly aware that bloggers’ links are great publicity, yet wanting to charge for its archives.. The New York Times updates us on the latest in string theory in today’s science section, and it makes for some mind-blowing paragraphs:

“In the long run,” he said, “the universe doesn’t want to be four-dimensional. It wants to be 10 dimensions.”

So sooner or later, the loops will unravel like a tangle of rubber bands, passing through a succession of configurations that take less and less energy to maintain, until finally the other dimensions expand and the cosmological constant is gone.

The decay of the cosmological constant will be fatal, astronomers agree. At that moment a bubble of 10-dimensional space will sweep out at the speed of light, rearranging physics and the prospects of atoms and planets, not to mention biological creatures.

So all of you hoping for everlasting fame or immortality, don’t waste your energy. Literally.

Yep, if I won the lottery, I’d go straight back to university, paying brilliant but hungry PhD candidates to stay patiently by my side as I stumble through mathematical foothills, up to physics base camp, then making the ascent into the rarified air of quantum physics, hoping for a glimpse of the Theory of Everything at the summit. So far, nobody’s made it all the way up, or at least come back alive.

Unfortunately, because I have a modicum of numeracy, I will never play the lottery. Catch-22.

Summer dulldrums

Is August a bad month for blogging? Even James Lileks felt compelled to apologise today (“nothing I’ve written here in the last gasp of August has satisfied me…”) and I certainly did, sort of, a few posts back. Andrew Sullivan may have been on to something when he shuttered up completely for the month. Could it be that blogs are inherently derivative, in the sense that they feed on news, and on a slow news month they simply lose their verve?

Or perhaps there are more people on vacation in August, so there are simply fewer participants thrumming on the great sounding board that is blogging. This makes more sense, as August has hardly turned out to be slow in the news department.

Still, blogaholics find ready enablers in the millions of internet dens that now dot holiday destinations. I certainly was able to get my fix in western Ireland, and Ben Hammersley is getting his in Kabul. But over the past few days, as I read his blog, I have noticed an aspect of his writing that I recognized in my own over the past month or so: it’s the tone of the travelog, of the visitor, of the person skimming the surface of a place, and by necessity this is not as enlightening as the writings of an expat (site currently down) living in the place, or that of a well-travelled native. I think this is because the best writing about places is about the author’s connections to those places. It takes time to make those connections — at the very least, it takes longer than a holiday.

So perhaps summer blogging is a little like the summer fling: fun while it lasts, but of no lasting importance.

Irish Broadband

Warning: The following is another of those horrid posts about the mechanics of the internet. Not interesting at all, but in the same way that breathing isn’t interesting…

If hell is an offline existence, then surely purgatory is dialup internet access. I was weaned on 1Mbps+ in New York, and in Sweden I was ogling the 26 Mbps (!) service being introduced by Bostream, so when I saw my parents’ paltry setup here in Dublin I decided to get them up to speed, so to speak.

Ireland, the European technology darling of the 90s, would surely be drenched in broadband. Not so. I was told there was no broadband internet access available to our (posh) area in Dublin. Incredulous, I set out to prove the naysayers wrong, and thought I had scored an early victory when I found that the local cable company, NTL, had started broadband services just last month. I called them, expectantly, but they informed me that they were only experimenting, really, and no, our area wasn’t going to be serviced for a long while yet.

They did, however, offer a special kind of internet access that they would gladly install anywhere in Dublin. The salesman quoted the price a little sheepishly: 9800 a year for a 512kbps leased line. I actually said “Oh, that’s not too bad” before I realized he was talking in euros, not kroner. For that price, I would expect my emails to be delivered personally. No wonder NTL is not rushing to roll out cheap cable internet services.

DSL, then. No luck here either. Although the phone lines clearly suffice for the ISDN setup they support, they apparently don’t qualify for ADSL, the operator told us; either our phone lines are too old or we are too far from a switching station (here in the center of Dublin), though which of these two possible reasons it might be the operator wouldn’t tell. Could we get a new phone line? We could, but she couldn’t tell us if that new line would qualify until we got it. Fat chance, then.

Is it really possible nobody laid any decent cable in Dublin, through which the internet might flow unfettered to the masses? Apparently so, and I am not the only one to notice. It’s actually cause for a political movement here. Might there then be a push for free and public wireless access, á la what’s being built in the East Village? Well, there is a nascent group doing noble work here, yet Dublin is too diffuse and the transmitters too weak to blanket the area. But their nodemap did put me in touch with people who knew of a local company offering residential wireless internet access.

Bingo. They have a transmitter some 800 meters from the house, and an (obligatory) line-of-sight survey confirmed we get a good strong signal from it. Today they came and installed the antenna, and I’ve been in broadband heaven for hours now. Most surprising is the strong upload capacity: Earlier, I was video iChatting with Felix in New York. Nice perk: a fixed IP address!

Watch this space. I have a huge backblog to inflict on you in the next few days.

2003: eServer Odyssey

What would an advertisement for the HAL 9000 in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey look like? Perhaps the copy would read something like:

Triggers routine analysis to help prevent component failure. … Designed to sense when any of up to six system components exceeds a safe threshold. The server will inform the system administrator who can calmly replace the component up to 48 hours before the projected point of failure.

But that’s actually IBM’s new advertising campaign, for their eServer xSeries, found in today’s Economist. Calmly? Like this? —

HAL: Just a moment. Just a moment. I’ve just picked up a fault in the AE 35 unit. It’s going to go 100 percent failure in 72 hours.

BOWMAN: It’s still within operational limits right now?

HAL: yes, and it will stay that way until it fails.

BOWMAN: Would you say that we have a reliable 72 hours until failure?

HAL: Yes, that’s a completely reliable figure.

BOWMAN: Well, I suppose we’ll have to bring it in…

All system administrators know how this eventually ends:

BOWMAN: Open the pod bay doors HAL.

HAL: I’m sorry Dave, Im afraid I can’t do that.

HAL: Dave, this conversation can serve no purpose any more. Good bye.

Would sys admins really steer their CTO towards the purchase of such a machine? Of course they would. And notice the shape and color of the machine shown on the ad. How… monolith-like. There is no doubt IBM is finally recognizing HAL as its prodigal son, some 25 years after the company withdrew permission for the use of its logo in the film when it became clear the computer in question was a paranoid schizophrenic. IBM thus joins the ranks of Mercedes, which co-opted the Janis Joplin song Mercedes Benz for a car commercial a few years back.

Blogspam

…And the innocent days of blogging are over. Over the past few months I’ve deleted exactly two nutcase comments off my blog, both virulently antisemitic and adding nothing to the argument at hand (hey, this is my free speech zone, not yours), but at the very least they were personal, the work of individuals exercising their demented minds.

Yesterday, this comment appeared on my blog: “You are not the only one.” It came from a (no doubt) fake hotmail address with a link, not to a blog or a home page, but to a website selling US and Canadian zip codes for download, an obvious marketing scheme cum sales pyramid replete with spelling mistakes and worthless merchandise.

As a tactic, there could have been worse blogspam comments than “You are not the only one.” Blog posts are typically opinionated, so such a rejoinder would not usually stand out, and bloggers, who tend to revel in reciprocity, will likely click through to see who was kind enough to comment.

I wondered what to call the meshing of these two great internet memes. I searched Google for “blogspam”, and sure enough, 135 pages already carry this newest web term. It’s inevitable, perhaps, but also sad; blog comments are opportunities for strangers to reach strangers, much as bulk emails are, but whereas we have spent a few years building defenses against spam, blog readers (including me) are still wide-eyed innocents, ready to click through on comments in the anticipation of surfing to exciting new places. I’m sure spammers will find blogspam a particularly lush pasture for clickthroughs, though I doubt they will get much sales from bloggers and their readers, who are arguably the savviest, most spam-hating subgroup on the internet.

Thankfully, there are technical solutions to stopping blogspam completely. Unlike email, commenting involves an opportunity for the server to engage in feedback with the submitter. This should allow the server to determine if the submitter is human; some techniques are discussed here. So we will have to wait for the Movable Type plugin, or eventually pay for some kind of filtering technology, but while I can secure my blog, I will still be subjected to blogspam when I visit other, less sophisticated blogs.

Die, spammers, die.

Apple of my iSight

Much as I try to get people to blog, I try to avoid blogging about blogging. It’s a bit too meta for me. Same goes for all things Apple; I love ’em, everybody near me eventually caves in and buys one, but I try not to blog this particular passion of mineIt seems like there is a disproportionately large percentage of Mac-using bloggers, both in Sweden and NYC. Thinking different is a bloggable trait, is my guess..

In this case, however, I’d like to note a particular feature of Apple’s new iChat AV application that I have not seen mentioned elsewhere. I’ve been using my Canon Elura DV camera as the iChat video input, and it works flawlessly. I’ve been videochatting with Matthew and Kim in New York; Matthew and I have even used it to gloat or despair while playing Scrabble online.

But today, I was using my DV camera to do some logging and capturing in FCP when I started to wonder if I could send that video feed over iChat. I fired up a one-way video stream to Felix (who “only” has voice, the second class citizen that he is), and sure enough, he could see the rough cuts, with sound, while we commented away via text. In other words, whatever is on a DV tape can be monitored live by any iChat AV user.

Sure, the quality is much lower than full-blown DV, but what a collaborative tool! You can now show rough cuts or edited works in real time to clients, and elicit live feedback. This is going to make the video crowd very happy.

I’m sure that with a bit of tweaking, it should be possible to get a video-in feed that comes off the television. This way, It’ll be possible to follow the baseball World Series live off American TV, should I be so inclined, and should Matthew be so kind.

Sourze vs Weblogs.se

It sounds like a dotcom business plan from the summer of 1997: “Let’s make a vanity publishing website, where people pay us to post their content. $13 for a single rant, $40 a month for unlimited rants. Then we give them a small portion of the money back in prizes: $450 for the month’s most popular post, $450 for our favorite post, and $5,500 to a ‘writer of the year’.”

I’ve been baffled by Sourze [Swedish] ever since Anna showed it to me after I explained blogging to her. “Oh, you mean like Sourze?” she said. No, not like Sourze. I have no idea how this site continues to function in the age of blogs. Sourze’s motto: “Everyone has something to tell. Tell it.”Sourze posts usually don’t make it past 200 reads, well below most blogs’ stats. And why should we trust the opinions of people who have been snookered into paying for their thoughts? Figure out the free blog already, get it listed on weblogs.se and sweblogs.com, and you will be guaranteed a sympathetic Swedish readershipGoogling Sourze, I find I’m not the only one questioning their business model..

I finally figured out tonight what it was that Sourze reminded me of: the $100,000 Porsche you could win at Dubai airport by buying one of a thousand $1,000 lottery tickets. You’d think that if you can afford a ticket at such odds, you’d probably already own the car, but evidently enough people have more money than sense.

Perhaps Sourze still exists because blogging has yet to reach a critical mass in Sweden. Its 9 million inhabitants boast some 170 self-reported weblogs, compared to 2148 self-reported blogs for a similar population in New York City.New York is a special case, granted. People who move there tend to come out as bloggers at an alarming rate. Unlike in New York, mentioning blogging in a casual conversation here still draws blank stares. The blogging meme likely needs another year before it perks the ears of mainstream Swedish media. But when it does, it will be a beautiful thing; A Swedish diplomat friend was complaining today that writing reports for the foreign ministry was such a damn formal affair. Why can’t they be more direct, more opinionated, more immediate, more inviting to dialogue, more like blogs? Why not indeed?

I’m debating whether I should translate this post into very bad Swedish, pay my $13, and post it on Sourze, as my small contribution to the coming Swedish blogging revolution…

The demise of the blog

Another day glued to CNN, with a pinch of Fox TV and Al jazeera. Furloughs in the blogosphere have been most disappointing, however; and this at the supposed hour of glory for blogsPerhaps the title The demise of the blog is a bit strong but I liked it too much not to use it. Also, this post is positioning itself so that when the inevitable backlash against blogs occurs, I can say I was ahead of the curve..

I opined a few weeks ago how blogs would add a unique new perspective to our understanding of war. But I was wrong. Embedded journalists who feed us victory and defeat live via videophone provide the unique new perspective in this war.

Some reasons why blogs have failed to live up to the challenge:

  • Traditional media still has clout: Kevin Sites was all set to report by day and blog by night,Update 27/03/03: A Time reporter in Iraq gets his blog shut down as well.
     
    How does CNN make money? The first few days of the war saw no ads at all on CNN. Then, a few days ago, a brave South African Airways offered up idyllic landscapes for escapist fantasies. The Croatians have now followed suit with an ad that intones, “The Mediterranean as it used to be,” but unfortunately the cynic in me keeps on answering “When, during the Balkan war?”
    but his last post, on Mar 21, says “I’ve been asked to suspend my war blogging for awhile,” because CNN feels his current job as correspondent is a full time commitment. Another tactic is to “embrace and extend”—several media outlets pay their reporters to write “behind the scenes” pieces that are meant to show color. But these have been raided for truly newsworthy content, and we get the feeling we’re reading the cutting room floor.
  • Preachers to the choir: God these blogs are boring: InstaPundit, Kausfiles, AlterNet, Andrew Sullivan, AntiWar and Little Green Footballs. Poring over every scrap of information to extract a favorable take, ignoring that which doesn’t fit the party line, vying for the most moral outrage given a Hollywood star’s latest brainless utterance or presidential mispronunciation. Moral clarity is peddled, but morale crutches are what we get. The price is no substantive debate.

  • Echo chamber: How many anti-war blogs carried Micheal Moore’s Oscars comments? How many warblogs blogged news of the “huge” chemical weapons factory? Enough said. And I get multiple copies of these emails in my inbox: You know the world is a crazy place when… I don’t need to see it on a blog as well. Blogs sometimes just seem to hoover the internet indiscriminately, a million mediocre editors with a few readers each, when in fact we need a few good editors informing millions.
  • Perhaps blogs have been promoted above their station. They are not proving to be the optimal tool for distilling the fog of war war into clear conclusions (though there are exceptionsBlatant plug for MemeFirst, I know.). The best blogs know their place—say, as a pointer to original commentary, or as a place for discussion among self-selecting groups; or act as a clearing house for local information, such as gossip.

    A blog on both your houses

    WWII was brought home via the radio. Vietnam via TV. Gulf War I via live TV. Gulf War II will be blogged.

    We’ve had the war blogs, and then the anti-war blogs, and now the meta-war blogs, and these will all shift into high gear a week or two from now in an orgy of point and counterpoint and I-told-you-sos and last words. But the most interesting posts will come from blogs on the ground. Kevin Sites, a CNN foreign correspondent covering the war, started his blog 4 days ago, and so far all of it has been riveting reading.

    Of course, blogging from inside the warzone could come to a screeching halt with a single use of the fabled electromagnetic pulse bomb.Chance of this being used in Iraq: 80% I think. Barring that, we could be in for some interesting color.

    And sound. Latest innovation in the blogosphere is audioblogging, whereby you call in your post to your Blogger.com-powered siteThe site promises to support other engines, including Movable Type, soon. and your visitors can listen to the audio. The likely success of this meme among arm-chair bloggers is questionable, but for those personal publishers in the field, far from internet access but close to a phone and with something urgent to say, this makes all the sense in the world. It is the marriage of radio’s immediacy with the internet’s scalability, and makes potential radio broadcasters of us all.

    From radio in WWII to radio in GWII: The wheel turns full circle. Oh dear, just noticed GWII could also stand for the current Prez. Guess this war will indeed define his presidency.